..insanity later

 
« Back to blog

About porting iPhone apps to the iPad, and why it might not work.

With the iPad launch coming closer, and first screenshots of ported iPhone apps showing up, I'm becoming more and more afraid that many apps for the iPad are going to be not so great. 

The huge addition of screen real-estate comes in handy for more complex apps, apps that display huge amounts of text, or other media that benefits from the large screen. But many of the little tools that are available on the iPhone don't really need such a large screen, and if you don't really have enough to show, chances are that your app is going to look pretty awful. The problem is, that most developers will probably port their apps anyway, because Apple doesn't offer a decent way to deliver apps with a relatively small functionality.

You can actually see this problem already on Apples iPad website. Why do you think Apple doesn't ship iPad versions of the calculator, the clock, the weather app or the stocks app? Because they wouldn't live up to Apples standards, if you'd just blow them up to the iPads screen. Another example for this is the contacts app. It sure looks good in horizontal mode, but if you rotate the iPad, you're left with ugly black borders on the top and bottom, because they didn't have any content to make use of that space.

I think this is a general problem of the iPad OS, Apple has to come up with a good solution for smaller apps, maybe some implementation of widgets. This way developers could get small apps on the iPad, without running into the dilemma of having too much screen real-estate, and users would benefit from it too, if they could take a look at a selection of smaller apps with a single gesture.

iPhone apps are looking pretty horrible on the iPad, but porting them to the huge screen doesn’t make sense for many of them. That’s why we need something in between.

 

Comments (8)

Mar 16, 2010
Even though the App Store has like 140,000+, the apps we use regularly are less than 30. These include apps by developers like Loren , Mark Jardine and designed by designers like Cocoia. These designers and developers care so much about good interfaces and their users, that you can be sure that they would make iPad version of their apps. The other 139970 apps? well.. Meh..
Mar 17, 2010
aryayush said...
Look who got bitten by the writing bug!

Nice going, man. :)

Mar 17, 2010
kvikly said...
Maybe,this will be the reason to enable multitasking.You can display this kind of apps in their original size in front of other apps or springboard then. :) Something like dashboard?
Mar 17, 2010
teucher said...
Something like dashboard sounds good, but I don't think that it should be running iPhone apps. If they implement some kind of dashboard, there should be optimized widgets for that.
Mar 17, 2010
James said...
To be fair, I don't think either developers or users are a stupid as you are making them out to be. People have been developing excellent applications for large screens for years, without any issue. They just have to think about how they can add features to make use of the space, it isn't hard. If they make rubbish limited apps, then no one will use them, it's that simple.
Mar 17, 2010
teucher said...
The difference between the iPad and other large screens, on a Macbook for example, is that you can't choose to use just a part of the screen. Limited apps aren't automatically bad, but on most other platforms limited apps have the option to go for a user interface that suits their needs.
Mar 17, 2010
Nate said...
Yeah, some apps could be augmented. For instance, an iPad version of Tweetie where a web browser takes up half or 3/4th of the screen and the user's timeline takes the other half or 1/4th.

But otherwise, there really is a need for some type of Dashboard, either for running iPhone apps concurrently in windowed mode or, what seems more likely to me, Mac OS X's own Dashboard widgets.

Or maybe they'll take a page from Google's Chrome OS and implement something like its Panels:
http://dev.chromium.org/chromium-os/user-experience/panels

Jan 17, 2011
Nicole Delope said...
IPad is not intended to replace computer in anyway.It however does a lot of things which a computer does and surprisingly it does better and faster.Ipad is an amazing invention from apple.It has many flaws and drawbacks too.Apple should consider those things.It doesnt have camera even.I usually shop on this online shopping site for ipad when i came acros with different blogs.Do check it out for many other products.Ipad and blackberry books are both the same.Blackberry book comes with many new feature while ipad lacks sum functions.

Leave a comment...